Yesterday I read an
article about the scientist who was awarded a Nobel prize for for
showing or photographing the same particle in two different places at
the same time; at least that's what I got out of the article after
having scanned it – actually it was quite lacking in specifics. So
last night while I lay awake listening to Anu
(said to be the primary creator/facilitator of the current
physical-existence), I began to look at this concept – that
something could be in two places at the same time, and I figured that
if the same particle could be in two different places at the same
time/moment, then it could also be in three, four, or five,
continuing on into/as the entirety of all of existence, implying that
all is or at least could be, 'One'. Anyway, the way I see it is, it's
not that matter/substance is in two different physical locations at
the same time; it's that the awarenesses/perspective of matter
within/as substance that, depending on one's perspective/awareness,
appears to be in different places at the same time, yet is always
actually just here. Because if all is 'One', then there is no
'there' – except in terms of awareness/perspective of and as what
is 'here'. In other words it's only the perspective or scope of
awareness that change. The scientist said it himself – it's just a
“ parlor trick” = illusion, and the results of this type of
experiment are known to be influenced by the observer. Of course, the
way I view things now will likely change in the future – as it has already rapidly changed – especially over the last five years, due in a
large part to what I’ve learned and or interpreted from that
material available at the Desteni
website. Actually, I do not expect that any of my views/observations
will turn out to be correct/incorrect; I'm recording this now because
it's where I am, and in the future perhaps
I will have the opportunity to see how my perspective has changed.
Currently I visualize existence in two ways: the way it is now, and
the way it could/should be.
The way I
visualize existence as it is now
In the beginning,
existence/we and all that has ever been here as us/existence was a
balloon shaped substance as a single-being or awareness. Then for
some reason, we (as the being/awareness) divided our awareness into
two equal/identical awarenesses. Thus we had two identical
awarenesses/beings that were equal and one within and as the same
substance/existence, yet in terms of awareness, each was only aware
of itself – limited to its half of existence and separated/defined
by its relationship to itself and the other self-awareness / half of
existence. In other words, the two sides of existence were not
actually separate, yet their awarenesses of themselves as one with
and equal to each other and/as the whole was limited/separate – as
in the illusion of separation. As I view it, there is constant or
equation within and as existence that says (simply) what happens
in/as one, happens equally in/as all, implying absolute equality
within and as the substance of/as all of existence. This makes sense
to me because the whole is always equal to the sum of its parts, and
that number is always one. Thus in starting with 'One', and
exponentially multiplying or dividing by any number (not zero it's
just a concept), the sum and or sum-total of the equation is always
going to equal 'One' (at least that's how I visualize it) - thus, the
absolute equality and oneness within and as the substance of/as
existence, which is a way I visualize equality and oneness, and in
this view regardless of from which point or perspective I look, all
is still 'One'. Yet depending on the perspectives/awarenesses of the
single-points or singularities within/as existence all may not be
equal, and here in the illusion of separation lies the inequality
within and as existence as a whole. We have limited our
self-awareness to such an extent as consciousness that we do not see
ourselves as one with and equal to all that is here; we don't
see/realize that what we do unto another we are actually doing unto
ourselves. This as I have repeatedly been informed will all become
clear at death. Yet why should we wait for death to finally realize
the common-sense of equality and oneness?
My visualization
of how existence could/should be
If – in the beginning we as one awareness had realized our
oneness with/as all of existence and, in separating our
self-awareness into innumerable singularities, realized our new-self
awarenesses as singularities one with and equal to all of existence –
as ourselves: then perhaps existence would now look a lot different.
In other words, in once again looking at the bubble of existence, I
visualize our 'One' awareness splitting into separate awarenesses /
singularities, yet with each singularity still aware of self's
equality and oneness with and as all of existence. It's like, in the
first visualization (as in cellular division), one awareness is
divided into two awareness – equal and one-within/as existence; the
awarenesses divide again and again and again... However, in my
visualization of how existence should be, the awareness of each of
the innumerable singularities overlap one another to include
each-other within and as all of existence. Thus, at any given moment
a singularity could be/express itself as a singularity - itself in
relation to all of itself as existence; it could expand its awareness
to include all of existence, or perhaps it could merge its awareness with
other awareness, so as to (from a limited-awareness perspective) appear to be the
same singularity in two places at the same time. The differentiating
factor of each point/singularity within and as our 'New' existence
would be each singularity's self-awareness expression in the
moment within and as equality and oneness. This is kind of how I see a small piece of the puzzle of existence from where I’m now sitting. Now, I'll get back to figuring out how to identify and remove personality systems.
No comments:
Post a Comment