Saturday, August 31, 2019

The Cost of our Syntax


Atlanteans - The Symbols, Sounds and Energy of Creation - Part 50
In moving along  today without getting bogged  down in this blog with all of the other questions coming up inside of my mind, the subject I’m pushing myself to remain “focused on” is once again related to syntax. Thankfully, every time I write this out, of which I usually endeavor to post only the bits I am able to understand a little and am able to explain somewhat clearly, I begin to see a little more clearly on the way to a complete understanding.

As I’ve said before, an interesting facet of our existence is that a record of everything that has always been, including the evolution or devolution of its design is still here as information, substance and/or derivatives of substance “in formations” of the symbols of creation, which one is able to investigate by reading the lines to see not only what has been created since the beginning, but also the movement of creation (as per its design changes) all the way up until the design of what is presently here.

And from this point (in short), we actually have the ability not only to understand how we’ve been (to the point of how we are right now), but also how we’re able to redesign ourselves and our entire existence essentially by rearranging the symbols, writing them right and test walking various designs until we’re ready to substantiate such designs into and as this physical existence.  For example of how we actually are, that we’re perhaps not realizing due to our misinterpretation of the symbols, let us have a look at the word “syntax,” because words never lie.

syn·tax
/ˈsinˌtaks/
noun: syntax
1.   the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language.: "the syntax of English". Google’s viewpoint/presentation.

As per my interpretation:
What is syntax, but a SIN TAX (as is clearly indicated within and as the sound symbolism of the word itself) that we pay in the currency of life debited or subtracted from each one’s opportunity to express as life to one’s potential.

How much we’re actually agreeing to pay by nullifying and/or sacrificing our potential to live is able to be seen, understood and even renegotiated by understanding the syntax of our words to (in short) identify where we are taxing ourselves via identifying the corruption of and as the words we cast out in the spells of our sentences, sentencing ourselves by, instead of harmonically specifying sound intentions designed and placed specifically as a matter of creation. 

And just to be sure that no one can credibly say, I was cheated, I didn’t know or I wasn't told, an invoice (in the words as the symbols of sound) of how much we spend of our sound-creative potential is always here for us to listen to and/or view within and as the syntax or sin-tax of our sentences.

There is a reason why those in power and control way up in the hierarchy have often sought to butcher the original properties of language, especially the widely used English language. Words, as the most powerful force of creation are the tools that have never (I guess) been fully understood.

In the old days, magicians, witches and the likes apparently knew how to use them to an extent by specifically writing their intentions into their spells to be cast out into the physical existence to influence (as per the resonance of the casts or molds) the targeted substances of the physical existence.

These days however, I guess the knowledge of how to precisely do this is very rare. And even if one does understand how to do it, they will surely also understand that the influence to the external environment is not only going to be temporary but also dependent on the extent of one’s understanding of the physical environment. 

In any case, for those who may have wondered why there is such a big top down push these days to butcher the English language even more with the introduction and enforcement of so-called politically correct syntax, look no further than the desire of the elite to continue disrupting people’s creative abilities by way of dictating and imposing their own syntax.

Why am I still bringing up this subject, investigating it and sharing my process in relation to it? Aside from that old saying, investigate all things… I feel (on the way to understanding) that it is going to be very, very important to for us to understand this point in the future (for our future), which is why I’m working on it right now.

And I’m going to leave this here for now.

No comments: