Notes on Current events and Democracy, 12/6/2020

 

The monster that you create to go fourth and consume will always return home for one last meal. Welcome to the color revolution that is now playing out in the USA. It is the manifested consequence of the ill deeds and doings by secretive organizations that we the people accepted and allowed either overtly or by way of ignorance and apathy towards those for whom we felt no misery. As such, the monster that we created has now returned home for the people of the USA to taste what was so often sent out by the CIA in the name of America.

 Thankfully, there are many ways to eliminate monsters. The key, as with all things evil, is not to feed or fight them with fear, but to guide their momentum in the direction of correction based on your own design. In this case, it appears that Trump and the Q team (and whoever else) have lured the Color Revolution monster into what looked like an easy-meal election steal, only to find itself trapped on display and fully exposed for all to see the fraud that has forever belied the notion of American Democracy. The truth is difficult, but must be faced if we are to ever move on.

 Like it or not, change in the big is the sum total of all of the small steps taken by each one of us to change ourselves. Thus, no matter how much assistance and support is inputted from the outside, the maximum amount of benefit able to be realized by humans is always going to be equivalent to the extent that we will responsibly manage such benefits. Thus it is that change in the big must be substantiated by the masses on the ground, which is why real change overall will only manifest via an expansion of our understanding of democracy via the people participation and the movement of the people.

 Unfortunately, most people don’t even know what democracy is, let alone how little of it is actually designed into the systems of government – which is why they’re called democratic governments rather than people’s democracies.

 

Refresher course:

Given that democracy is simply a form of collective decision-making, wherein the degree of democracy expressed is equivalent to the degree by which all members of the collective have the opportunity to participate equally in all of the decision-making processes for all outcomes that apply to the collective as a whole, the real amount of democracy built into the United States federal system (for example) is roughly 0.068%.

 To see this, simply take the numbers of days that people get to participate, one time every four years or 1 day divided by 1,460 days to get 0.068% of the potential of the potential to fully participate. The reason for this is simply because, during each four years, "the people" actually only get to participate one day out of those four year (on the day they get to vote or participate in the decision making processes). When calculating the degree of democracy expressed, it all comes down to the amount of "opportunity each one has to participate equally in the decision making processes." 

 Getting to a state of real democracy is going to be a step by step journey, for which there are now two paths forming in the world for the people to decide which one they prefer, the Globalist plan or the Nationalist plan?

 With the US pivoting into itself rather than reaching outwards to embrace globalism to change the world, a lot of people are perhaps wondering which plan is better, the globalist/World Economic Forum plan that promises strict control and a guaranteed basic income or the Nationalist plan that promises freedom and the equal application of law within in a meritocratic system.

 In short, I do not see the globalist plan succeeding in the long run due to the design structure of their decision-making bodies being centralized and extending outwards towards everything within every sector of the biosphere.  Instead of using their vast wealth to design creative ways to manage and care for the planet by the raising up the masses to take responsibility from the ground up in a step by step manner as each person is able (as is the decision-making structure of a real democracy), the globalist oligarchs have simply replaced the illusion of democracy with a technocracy as the pseudoscientific authority, then rounded the edges of their pyramidal symbol of power and control to display a top down view of it so that it appears to be a flattened circle - when in reality it’s still a cone with them at as rulers the top of it. The bottom line: it’s nothing more than an updated enslavement system with the latest technology to allow them to continue their rule.

 Contrast that with the direction of change in the United states under the Trump leadership and a completely different picture/plan (from my perspective) begins to materialize. Firstly, I notice a push to return to a more traditional interpretation of the Constitution and the rule of law, which is necessary for a functioning society to change itself as it determines.

 Secondly, I see a push for the US to reduce its dependency on other countries and focus on self-sustainability. The bottom line: if you’re not even able to take care of yourself during normal times, you’re certainly not going to be able to offer support to anyone else during difficult times; from the individual to the family, community, city, state, etc., everyone’s first responsibility is to care for themselves so as to also be able to care for others in need.

 Finally, there is, I perceive a push in the US to root out corruption and eventually revise the Constitution to better prevent corruption. And, as this gets done, I suspect that we will end up having a minimum income guaranteed in the United States, as well as education reform, a returning of the decision-making authority back to the people and so on.  

 Though it may appear that we are walking through hell, I think we’re actually moving in the right direction. Just gotta push through these difficult times. 

Always remember, it is usually in the most difficult times that the biggest opportunities for self-change arise.