What I once thought
would be a simple matter of standing our ground, exercising our legal rights as
homeowners, is now going into its 4th or 5th year. For additional context, please see parts one, two, three and four.
The legal
aspects of the case have not changed very much. The townhouses within each of
the six building-units in our community are connected; however, each home individually
owns their own roof. Some of the roofs in our community, namely a few that hang
at 90 degrees (instead of 30 degrees as ours does) began to fall. Then, dome homeowners in the community began
a campaign to sue the building company, demanding they replace all of the roofs,
free of charge. In the meantime, this small group convinced or pressured most of the people in
the community replace their roofs. My stance was as continues to be that,
most of the roofs have or had no problem whatsoever; I liked my roof just the
way it was and did not have money to waste on meritless projects. This
small group also insisted that, only they were permitted to negotiate with the
roofing company, and everyone else had to sign the contract without a fixed
price even on it. This led me to consider that, perhaps there was some underhanded dealing taking place.
I attempted
to speak at a community meeting, but was physically pushed aside; so I decided to let
them do as they would, while my partner and I stood our ground. While I was
away working in the center of Taiwan, my partner endured a tremendous amount of
verbal bullying from the group of people I refer to as the gang of 4-5. She experienced firsthand how cruel some
people become when someone refuses to obey their commands. There were even times when she and
I agreed that we would go ahead and change the roof, just to end the battle. However,
by then, it was too late. Two people in the gang saw to it that, even if we agreed
to change our roof with the rest of the community, we would still have to sign
a blank check/contract and they would be the ones to decide how much it would have to
pay. Either it was punishment for disobeying them or perhaps they just didn't want us to any say in the terms of work that would be done on our house. Either way, we once again decided to stand our ground.
In looking
back at the situation, I see that, there were many times when I perhaps could have
intervened and ended this argument by purposefully using my communication skills to communicate with people of
the community. I figured that, the key to working with the community was to
address them. However, my partner has always been steadfastly against me
speaking directly to community members about this subject. She says that, my
Chinese is not good enough and that, even though they would smile in front of you,
they would stab you in the back, later.
My partner has experienced a lot of that backstabbing by community members throughout this process and perhaps she is correct about my Chinese not being enough to communicate my views effectively. Furthermore, the community suit against the building company left the gang of four (now down to two) with little choice but to continue to insist that our roof is broken, dangerous and must be replaced. Because this is argument they used to sue the building company and convince others to replace their roofs. After thirteen years, thousands of earthquakes and dozens of typhoons, our roof is still fine; however, within months after replacing the rest of the community’s roofs, 4-5 of them had areas wherein the tile just seemed to explode. I am not certain why, but I guess it was due to them using cheap, inferior tiles (which I had also argued against) to replace the original, more expensive ones that came from Japan.
My partner has experienced a lot of that backstabbing by community members throughout this process and perhaps she is correct about my Chinese not being enough to communicate my views effectively. Furthermore, the community suit against the building company left the gang of four (now down to two) with little choice but to continue to insist that our roof is broken, dangerous and must be replaced. Because this is argument they used to sue the building company and convince others to replace their roofs. After thirteen years, thousands of earthquakes and dozens of typhoons, our roof is still fine; however, within months after replacing the rest of the community’s roofs, 4-5 of them had areas wherein the tile just seemed to explode. I am not certain why, but I guess it was due to them using cheap, inferior tiles (which I had also argued against) to replace the original, more expensive ones that came from Japan.
My partner
is one of those law-abiding types and I guess she figured that our legal rights
would be honored and protected by the law. The problem with this type of
thinking is that, it does not account for the nature of the human and the reality
of a legal system that is compromised by the capitalist system. The bottom
line: human-law honor those who are willing and able to pay for such honors. We
are able to pay and unfortunately, we really do not have much of a choice anymore.
Now, it is
time for me to change the course of this story. In the past, I stood aside, let
a small group of people dictate and pressure the community into suing an outstanding building company and changing 41 or 42 roofs when only a few required fixing. These 2 or three have been blocking our front entrance
with orange cones and have managed to use community money to sue my partner in an attempt to force us to replace our roof and kick us out of our home.
They lost
the first case against the building company. The court judgment stated basically,
what I have been stating all along. The second case against the building
company is in its final stage and judgement should be handed down soon. A few days ago,
my partner and I paid a legal firm in Taipei to take over the
defensive part of this case from my partner. She has worked extremely hard in
an attempt to use the law to make things right, and I encouraged her because I
thought it would be a good learning experience and keep her busy. I am probably
correct on both accounts; after all, she has now begun to study law and may go
so far as to get a license to practice it. Nevertheless, I am now stepping off
the sidelines and moving into this playing field.
Herein, I find
myself in somewhat of a slightly uncomfortable situation, which is the root of
the reason that I write this. The constructs within me say that, the way to win
is to attack, wear-down, divide and destroy your opponents. However, an
emerging voice within and as me says that, this way of thinking is just what is
destroying all of humanity. I used to smile and have friendly conversations
with two of the main instigators of this situation. Now, these two are being
sued by us and awaiting to find out if the prosecutor is going to press
criminal charges. They publically (on tape) called my partner some very mean
words and accused her of doing that which she had not. Actually, it even got a
lot worse. Some people yelled and screamed at us, telling us that we were too poor
to live in their community and stuff like that. I wanted nothing more than to
sell this house a long time ago; take a profit on it and move to
the countryside, but I guess I am not going to do that now, at least not yet.
Getting back
to the reason for writing this out. Here is how I commit to precede in relation to
the community and the two people that are left of the gang of 4-5. First, I am
no longer going sit by and watch as anyone blocks my front entrance with orange
cones. Even though, I am able to walk around them, they represent intimidation and a point of me standing on the sidelines. Yea, I remember the old saying, sticks and stones
may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. However, I am still going to
remove these cones every time someone places them in front of my entrance. Why?
Because they interrupt my view of the trees and park across the street and they serve as a warning sign, telling visitors not to go to our house.
Additionally,
from now on, I commit to participate in every community meeting. A few may yell
at me; tell me to shut up and sit down. However, I am not going to do that. I realize that, the
betterment of human nature has to be cultivated and not forced upon people.
Therefore, I will participate within the community, and I will tell them that,
we are able to have a community democracy wherein all voices are heard and all
are free to choose without having to give in to the pressure of a few. I may
even look into some democracy software and see if enough people are willing to
try it. Most importantly though, I will encourage my partner and I to walk a path of reconciliation.
I once wrote in reference to the people and the government that, one side has
to offer the other side an olive branch in order for the conflict to end. Thus,
I commit to do this: not because it is what I feel like doing, but because I am
certain it is what is best for all. I will inform you how this approach goes in
another post.
No comments:
Post a Comment